Accelerating Clinical Data Review: Addressing Fragmentation, Improving Collaboration, and Reducing Review Cycle Times by 35% 

1 minute read

Published: June 4th, 2025

If your clinical data review process feels slow, fragmented, or error-prone, this case study shows how Phastar and Beaconcure cut review cycle times by over 35%. Learn how a centralized platform can:

  • Save your team time and effort
  • Improve collaboration and transparency
  • Ensure audit-ready documentation
  • Help you hit critical submission deadlines faster

Whether you’re a sponsor, CRO, or data manager, this is essential reading to modernize your review workflows and accelerate trial timelines. Complete the form below to access the full case study.

Related articles

Efficient Project Management for a Late-Stage Parkinson’s Disease Study 

Efficient Project Management for a Late-Stage Parkinson’s Disease Study 

January 6th, 2026 1 minute read

Phastar partnered with a biotechnology sponsor to manage statistical and data management activities for a late-stage ...

Turning Legacy Complexity into Submission-Ready Confidence

Turning Legacy Complexity into Submission-Ready Confidence

November 24th, 2025 1 minute read

Discover how Phastar converted 16 legacy studies into SDTM and delivered a robust Integrated Summary of Safety (ISS) ...

Delivering a Complex Integrated Summary of Effectiveness: Efficient Pooling and Advanced Analysis Across Four Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Studies 

Delivering a Complex Integrated Summary of Effectiveness: Efficient Pooling and Advanced Analysis Across Four Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Studies 

November 17th, 2025 1 minute read

A sponsor needed to pool data from four MS spasticity studies—one still ongoing with another vendor—while adapting mi...