woman pointing at data on a transparent screen

Investigation into Bioequivalence Study

1 minute read

Published: September 3rd, 2021

A new formulation under investigation was planned to be submitted for use in both the US and Europe. As the reference formulation in the US differs from that in Europe, two separate bioequivalence studies were needed to gain approval from the FDA and EMA. Study 1 was conducted for FDA approval and successfully demonstrated bioequivalence. Study 2 was conducted for EMA approval and whilst AUC was within the bioequivalence limits, Cmax was not, and bioequivalence could not formally be declared.

Complete the form below to read the full case study

Related articles

Delivering Integrated Safety and Efficacy Analyses in Cushing Syndrome

Delivering Integrated Safety and Efficacy Analyses in Cushing Syndrome

October 6th, 2025 1 minute read

When faced with evolving analysis plans, minimal client infrastructure, and shifting output volumes, Phastar delivere...

Delivering a Complex ISS in Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

Delivering a Complex ISS in Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

September 26th, 2025 1 minute read

Phastar supported a sponsor in delivering a high-quality Integrated Summary of Safety (ISS) for a rare disease progra...

Delivering Integrated Efficacy and Safety Summaries in VMS

Delivering Integrated Efficacy and Safety Summaries in VMS

September 26th, 2025 1 minute read

Integrating efficacy and safety data across multiple studies is never simple—especially when patient-reported outcome...